Lifestyle vs. Investment and Angel vs. VC
Last night I spoke at Seattle Tech Startups. Given that lots of people who go to these meetings tend to be wantrepreneurs (aspiring startup folks), I focused on early decisions that need to be be made. Do you shoot for a great lifestyle business or do you aim for a grandslam? Services biz or product biz? Bootstrap it, find angels, or court VCs? And when you answer all that, how do you settle on an idea when you have lots of them bounding around in your head (for this part, I liberally borrowed from Ev Williams’ great post on evaluating startup ideas, which I posted a riff on a while back).
After my short presentation, there were some really fabulous questions. Two of ‘em kept me thinking and I wanted to expand on the answers a bit. Here they are.
Question (paraphrased): “Given that takinghuge piles of VC money both has the dangers you describe and and firmly closes the door on most early acquisition opportunities, why are people still going after big VC?”
My response was two-fold at the time. First, there are some ideas that require a lot of money– as an example, I mentioned a local northwest guy who is working on a really cool electric motorcycle… It’d be hard to imagine getting that business off the ground with $500k of angel money. I also mentioned that some entrepreneurs look at their valuation as a score. Taking $4m on $12m post-money is essentially saying that, on paper, your company is worth $12m. Feels pretty cool, I suppose.
Two more things to add here.
First, I think people chase VC because it’s available. Angels are purposefully elusive– they don’t exactly hang out a shingle saying, “I’ve got $50k burning a hole in my pocket”. VCs, on the other hand, have a web site, and processes to handle/process deal flow. They almost always want to lead the investment by negotiating terms and putting in a big chunk of the money, while angels sometimes shy away from leading/negotiating, but are happy to pile on with other investors.
I think there is a big hole to be filled here by institutional investors who aim at a larger number of smaller deals (something that most VCs can’t handle because they have too much money under management, take too long to do the deals, and have too few people to sit on boards). There are smaller funds out there that are starting to fill the “early/small” niche (with $250k-$1m investments) but they are rare and (from an outsider’s point of view) are buried in interesting startups to invest in. The good news is that they’re seeing great success, so more are popping up every day. If you want to see a good list of folks who are really looking at early-stage/lower-dollar deals, here’s a great article profiling a few. You’ll notice a decided lack of ‘em in the Northwest. Madrona is mentioned but I think they very rarely do a deal less than $1m.
Second, B2B. Despite Web 2.0 hype, there is tremendous money to be made with B2B software. Going the B2B route requires a sales engine or some clever distribution innovation. If you’re spinning up a sales team, that requires LOTS of money flowing out of your business (salary, commissions) before you recognize revenue for their efforts.
Question #2: “Can you talk about how to decide whether a business/idea should fall into the “lifestyle” category or the “get funding a go big” category?
My answer last night centered around overall magnitude of the idea. Could you imagine it being the next Google/Facebook/Salesforce.com? Is it that ambitious? Can you set out milestones where you end up selling for $100 million? I also mentioned that how much you NEED is important. If you can “run the experiment” for $500k to see if your market/team/idea are as good as you think, raising $10m is silly. If you can roll those same dice taking no funding and working on weekends, raising ANY money might be silly.
What I want to add: Think about how you fit into recent investment trends. Investors closely follow trends. Most seem to focus on trends and recent acquisitions that you’re already reading about– the top tier ones often try to anticipate what’s going to be the next trend. Imagine yourself pitching your idea to someone who religiously follows and tries to anticipate trends. Will their eyes light up? To my amateur eye trends that are important out there right now are: Ad networks, widgets, casual gaming, video advertising, iPhone/mobile apps, Facebook/MySpace apps, social aggregation, and (of course) anything that could credibly take a shot at killing Google. Am I missing any? There are a few tired trends that probably still have legs with some investors like niche social networks, social news sites, photosharing, etc.
If you’re outside these trends, that’s okay (we certainly are, though we think that productivity/information overload is a meme that is growing like gangbusters). It just means that you’re going to have a harder time raising money and you’ll need a bit more traction to pique VC interest. We’re just about ready to close our angel round with a fairly platinum-plated group of investors, so it’s certainly do-able. I’m just glad our founders all had hefty personal bank accounts to allow us to grow the business over the 3 months of fundraising. I know plenty of people who’ve needed 6-10 months to raise a round, so be prepared for that if you’re bucking trends.
Remember, Google came to a market that had well-funded mature players at a time when a lot of really smart people were saying that search was a dead business where you couldn’t make any money.
Another thing to consider on this front is this: Do you have some unique aspect of your business that allows you to acquire new users/customers for zero or near-zero cost? SEO, viral marketing, user-generated content are all fabulous ways to get an organic flow of visitors to your product. VCs love clever distribution wrinkles, and most successful startups have a fabulous (if sometimes accidental) story to tell here.
And finally– the best way to decide whether it’s a small biz opportunity or a huge business opportunity is to launch. If you’ve got something big, the market will start dragging you down the growth path. If it’s a big opportunity and you’re growing like gangbusters out in the wild, funding isn’t hard.
Anyhoo– hope folks enjoyed the talk– I’ll post the video if STS puts it up.
Tony Wright, the original author of this post, is an active entrepreneur in the Seattle area. His startup, RescueTime, provides time management software for individuals and businesses. He blogs about web startups at Tony Wright dot Com.
Tags: angel financing, Raising money, startups, vc financing








July 27th, 2008 at 6:42 pm
Good stuff, Tony. My thoughts …
“Given that taking huge piles of VC money both has the dangers you describe and and firmly closes the door on most early acquisition opportunities, why are people still going after big VC?”
Just as there are people who only eat at nice restaurants or only ski when the conditions are perfect, there are entrepreneurs who are only looking at big market opportunities (where selling for $10M isn’t on their radar). For instance, for someone who sold their last company for $100M+ then they might have their sights set on the next one going public and being worth $1B. When you think bigger like that, you tend to only think about bigger investment checks — like, why waste your time raising ONLY $1M and 50k at a time?! Look at McCaw and Clearwire — I’m not sure they even bothered with traditional VC instead going for ibank money right off the bat.
Plus VCs can often bring a lot more to the table than money, if you need certain experience, contacts, etc.
“Can you talk about how to decide whether a business/idea should fall into the “lifestyle” category or the “get funding a go big” category?”
It feels to me that the person/founder(s) should decide this for themselves, not the business. As in, do you *want* a lifestyle business (which are certainly the majority), or do you only want to swing a bit more for the fences. The majority of people in this world decide to have a business that earns them a comfortable living, which is fine. Then there are the nutcases (yours truly) that are only looking at big market opportunities and way different risk/reward ratios. Doesn’t mean one can’t lead to the other, but I think you need to decide what you want first THEN whether your idea fits.
December 10th, 2008 at 3:14 am
electric motorcycle…
I couldn’t have said it better myself….
December 11th, 2008 at 7:48 am
investment…
The TrackBack specification was created by Six Apart, who first implemented it in their Movable Type blogging software in August…
December 12th, 2008 at 5:49 am
Search Engines Parser is enormously fast, 100% automatic search engine results extractor you were dreaming about for many times. Search Engines Parser can extract results from all search engines at the same time, parse titles, descriptions and links automatically. You can specify which search engine(s) to use and what kind of data to parse. Search Engines Parser can output results to screen, export to MySQL database and write to CSV file.
December 14th, 2008 at 11:50 am
money market investment…
As a result, TrackBack spam filters similar to those implemented against comment spam now exist in many weblog publishing systems.It…
December 21st, 2008 at 5:57 pm
Sunday I was searching for sites related to Marketing and specifically set top box market and I found your site.
December 21st, 2008 at 11:27 pm
smart ways to invest money…
The term is used colloquially for any kind of Linkback.. This enables…
January 2nd, 2009 at 4:00 am
Hello, Useful information for pocket hole and your post regarding le vs. Investment and Angel vs. VC | The NWEN Blog looks very interesting. I just wanted to say good work on your site, I like the look and the information was useful.